Is the Federal Reserve About to Get a 'Back to Basics' Makeover?

Published on
November 25, 2025
A view of the Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building in Washington, D.C., symbolizing U.S. monetary policy decisions.
Author
Portrait of a person wearing round glasses and a light beige turtleneck sweater against a beige background.
Cooper Starr
Crypto analyst
Subscribe to our newsletter
Read about our privacy policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

The Fed's Future: A Call for Simplicity

In the complex world of finance, few institutions wield as much power as the U.S. Federal Reserve. Its decisions on interest rates and monetary policy can send shockwaves through global markets, affecting everything from your mortgage to the price of Bitcoin. Now, a powerful voice in financial circles is suggesting the Fed has lost its way, and that its next leader needs to bring it back to basics.

Scott Bessent, a hedge fund veteran and a potential candidate for U.S. Treasury Secretary, recently made waves with his comments at a Cato Institute event. His core message was simple yet profound: the Federal Reserve has become too complicated. He argues that the central bank has strayed far from its core duties, and that reeling it back in should be a top priority when selecting its next chair.

This isn't just an academic debate. It's a signal of a potential philosophical shift in how the U.S. economy is managed, a shift that could have significant consequences for investors, businesses, and the crypto market at large.

What Does a 'Complicated' Fed Even Mean?

To understand Bessent's critique, we need to look at the Fed's official job description. Historically, the central bank operates under a dual mandate given by Congress: to promote maximum employment and maintain stable prices. For decades, this has been the bedrock of its policy decisions. Think of it as balancing two key objectives to keep the economy healthy.

However, Bessent and other critics argue that in recent years, the Fed has engaged in what many call “mission creep.” They believe the institution has expanded its focus to include areas well outside its original mandate. Bessent specifically pointed to the Fed's increasing involvement in issues like climate change and social equity initiatives.

"We need to get back to the dual mandate," Bessent stated, emphasizing that the focus should be squarely on inflation and employment. The implication is that by wading into these other areas, the Fed not only oversteps its authority but also dilutes its effectiveness in performing its primary functions.

This perspective frames the Fed's expanded agenda as a distraction that complicates its decision making process and potentially politicizes an institution that is meant to be independent. The search for a new chair, in his view, is an opportunity to install a leader who will draw clear boundaries and refocus the bank on its foundational economic principles.

The High Stakes of Choosing the Next Chair

The term for the current Federal Reserve Chair, Jerome Powell, ends in 2026. While that may seem far off, the conversation about his successor is already heating up, especially with a presidential election on the horizon. If there is a change in administration, the selection for the next Fed leader could look very different.

Bessent's comments are particularly noteworthy because of his close ties to former President Donald Trump. If Trump wins the 2024 election, Bessent is widely seen as a top contender for Treasury Secretary. In that role, he would have significant influence over who gets nominated to lead the Fed.

A candidate for Fed Chair who aligns with Bessent’s philosophy would likely be someone with a more traditional, or hawkish, view of monetary policy. They would prioritize fighting inflation above all else and would be expected to resist pressures to use the Fed's tools to address broader social or political goals. Names like former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh and economist Arthur Laffer are often mentioned in these discussions, both known for their more orthodox economic views.

Why This Matters for Crypto Investors

So, how does a philosophical debate about the Federal Reserve's mandate connect to Bitcoin, Ethereum, and the broader digital asset space? The link is clearer than you might think.

  • Interest Rate Policy: A Fed laser focused on inflation might be more inclined to keep interest rates higher for longer or be slower to cut them. Higher interest rates typically make riskier assets, including cryptocurrencies, less attractive to investors. Easy money policies have historically fueled crypto bull runs, so a stricter, more disciplined Fed could create headwinds for the market.
  • Market Stability vs. Volatility: Proponents of a simplified Fed would argue that a predictable central bank focused on its core job creates a more stable economic environment for everyone. This stability could, in the long run, benefit crypto by fostering a healthier overall market. However, the transition to this new approach could introduce short term volatility as markets adjust their expectations.
  • Regulatory Focus: A Fed that intentionally stays out of areas like climate policy might also be less inclined to venture into direct, heavy handed regulation of digital assets, preferring to leave that to other agencies like the SEC and CFTC. This could be seen as a positive for the crypto industry, which often thrives on innovation and fears stifling oversight. It could lead to a clearer, more defined regulatory landscape rather than a web of overlapping jurisdictions.

A Turning Point for U.S. Monetary Policy?

The debate sparked by Scott Bessent's comments is more than just political maneuvering. It represents a fundamental question about the role of a central bank in the 21st century. Should it adapt and take on new challenges facing society, or should it remain a stoic, independent guardian of a narrow economic mandate?

The answer to that question will be largely determined by who sits in the Fed Chair's seat next. The choice will send a powerful signal to global markets about the future direction of U.S. monetary policy. For the crypto world, which is deeply sensitive to macroeconomic shifts, the selection of the next Fed Chair is not just a news headline. It's a critical event that could shape the landscape for years to come.

As the political season progresses, investors would be wise to pay close attention to the evolving conversation around the Federal Reserve. The call for a simpler, more focused central bank is growing louder, and it could soon become official policy.