In the fast paced world of cryptocurrency, clashes between new tech and old finance are nothing new. But the latest showdown has everyone talking. On one side, you have Tether, the undisputed king of stablecoins with a market cap soaring over $110 billion. On the other, you have S&P Global Ratings, a legacy institution whose opinions can shape markets and influence trillions of dollars. Recently, S&P Global took a close look at the stablecoin landscape and delivered a verdict that sent ripples through the industry. Their assessment of Tether’s USDT? A score of ‘5’, the lowest possible rating, labeling it as “weak.”
As you can imagine, Tether’s CEO, Paolo Ardoino, was not pleased. He came out swinging, criticizing the rating as fundamentally flawed and misleading. This isn’t just a simple disagreement. It’s a battle over trust, transparency, and the very definition of stability in the digital age. So, what’s really behind S&P’s harsh rating, and is Ardoino’s defense justified? Let’s break down this financial feud.
S&P Global’s report wasn’t just a random shot at Tether. It was a comprehensive analysis of the top eight stablecoins by market capitalization. The agency used a scale from 1 (very strong) to 5 (weak) to rank each coin based on several key factors. These included:
While Tether scored well on market position, it fell short in other critical areas, according to S&P. The report specifically pointed to what it called “gaps in disclosure and high-risk assets” in Tether’s reserves. This has been a long standing point of contention for critics who have questioned the precise composition of the assets backing every single USDT in circulation. Despite Tether’s massive market share, these concerns were enough for S&P to hand it the “weak” rating.
Paolo Ardoino didn’t waste any time responding. In a strongly worded statement, he accused S&P Global of missing the point entirely. He argued that the ratings agency was applying an outdated, traditional finance lens to an innovative digital asset, which led to a skewed and inaccurate conclusion.
“S&P Global’s recent stablecoin report is a prime example of a traditional ratings agency misjudging a revolutionary technology,” Ardoino stated. He emphasized that S&P’s analysis overlooks the real world performance and proven stability that Tether has demonstrated for years.
Ardoino’s defense centered on a few key arguments. First, he highlighted Tether’s commitment to transparency, pointing to their daily public reserve reports. He stressed that the majority of Tether’s reserves are held in extremely safe and liquid assets, primarily U.S. Treasury bills. This, he argues, makes USDT one of the most liquid financial products available, capable of handling massive redemptions even during extreme market stress.
He also took a direct shot at the institutions S&P typically rates favorably. Ardoino suggested a certain hypocrisy, noting that many traditional banks that receive high marks from S&P are far more leveraged and less transparent about their holdings than Tether. He feels that Tether is being held to a different, and perhaps unfair, standard simply because it operates in the crypto space.
To put Tether’s rating into perspective, it helps to see how its competitors measured up. S&P Global’s report wasn’t all bad news for the stablecoin market. In fact, some projects received glowing reviews.
The top spots went to Gemini Dollar (GUSD) and Pax Dollar (USDP), both of which earned a score of ‘2’, indicating a “strong” stability profile. Other major players like Circle’s USDC and TrueUSD (TUSD) received a ‘4’ or “constrained” rating. This spread of scores shows that S&P is making careful distinctions based on their criteria, not just painting the entire industry with a broad brush.
The high scores for GUSD and USDP likely stem from their stricter regulatory oversight and clearer reporting frameworks, which align more closely with what traditional financial assessors expect to see. This contrast makes Tether’s low score even more pronounced and fuels the debate over which model of transparency and stability is truly better.
This war of words is more than just corporate drama. It has real implications for the entire crypto ecosystem. Tether’s USDT is the lifeblood of crypto trading. It’s the most used stablecoin for moving in and out of positions, providing liquidity to exchanges, and accessing DeFi services. A blow to its reputation, especially from a respected entity like S&P Global, could shake user confidence.
Regulators are also watching closely. Reports like this can provide ammunition for stricter oversight of stablecoins, which lawmakers already have in their sights. The outcome of this debate could influence future regulations that shape how stablecoins operate globally.
Ultimately, this conflict highlights the ongoing tension between the established financial world and the disruptive force of cryptocurrency. S&P Global is judging by its long established rulebook, while Tether argues that a new game requires new rules. For now, Tether continues to operate as the market leader, seemingly unfazed by the criticism. Its massive user base, particularly in emerging markets, relies on USDT for financial access and stability. As Ardoino himself put it, Tether’s value is proven not by a rating, but by its utility and resilience in the real world. The question is whether that will be enough to win over the old guard of finance in the long run.
.png)