Just a couple of years ago, the conversation around Central Bank Digital Currencies, or CBDCs, was electric. It felt like every major economy was in a race to launch its own digital dollar, euro, or yuan. The idea was painted as the next logical step in the evolution of money: a government backed, fully digital version of cash that promised faster transactions, greater efficiency, and better financial inclusion. The hype was real. But lately, the buzz has quieted down. Instead of triumphant launch announcements, we are hearing words like “pause,” “reassessment,” and “research.”
It seems the global sprint towards CBDCs has turned into a slow, cautious marathon. Countries are hitting the brakes, taking a harder look at the monumental risks involved, and questioning if a CBDC is even the right solution to their problems. A perfect example of this new, pragmatic approach comes from South Africa, where the central bank has decided to shelve its digital currency plans for now. Their decision highlights a growing global trend: choosing practical upgrades over risky revolutions.
The South African Reserve Bank (SARB) had been exploring a retail CBDC through its Project Khokha 2 initiative. After extensive research and trials, they came to a sober conclusion. Instead of pouring immense resources into building a new digital currency from scratch, they would focus on modernizing their existing payment infrastructure first.
What does that mean in practice? SARB is prioritizing its Rapid Payments Programme (RPP). This system is designed to provide South Africans with instant, cheap, and reliable payment options using the infrastructure that is already in place. Think of it as a major software update for the country’s entire financial system. The goal is to achieve many of the same benefits a CBDC promised, such as lower transaction costs and faster settlements, but without the seismic risks and costs associated with a full CBDC rollout.
This decision is incredibly telling. The central bank looked at the problem, looked at the proposed solutions, and realized that a better, faster, and safer path was to improve what they already had. It is a classic case of pragmatism winning out over hype. And they are not alone.
South Africa’s move is not an isolated event. It is part of a much larger pattern of hesitation and re-evaluation among the world’s leading economies. The initial excitement has been replaced by a healthy dose of skepticism as policymakers grapple with the real world complexities of launching a national digital currency.
The European Central Bank (ECB) is proceeding with its digital euro project, but at a snail’s pace. They have officially entered a “preparation phase,” which sounds promising until you read the fine print. This phase is all about finalizing rulebooks and selecting development partners. A final decision on whether to actually issue a digital euro has not been made and is likely still years away. The ECB is taking its time, measuring twice and cutting once, fully aware that a misstep could have serious consequences for the Eurozone’s financial stability.
Across the channel, the Bank of England is in a similar holding pattern. They are deep in the “design phase” for a potential “Britcoin.” Officials have been careful to manage public expectations, repeatedly stressing that a digital pound would be a complement to physical cash, not a replacement. This messaging is a direct response to public fears about the erosion of privacy and the end of cash, which have become major roadblocks for CBDC adoption in democratic nations.
In the U.S., the Federal Reserve has made it clear that it is nowhere near a decision. The idea of a digital dollar is politically charged, with fierce debate raging about its potential impact on privacy and the role of government. Some politicians have voiced strong opposition, fearing a CBDC could be used as a tool for financial surveillance and control. With such deep political divisions, the U.S. is firmly in the research and development stage, with no clear path forward.
So, what is behind this widespread case of cold feet? As central banks move from theoretical whitepapers to practical pilot programs, they are confronting a wall of challenges that were once just abstract risks.
This is not to say that CBDCs are dead. The world’s most advanced project, China’s digital yuan (e-CNY), continues its slow and steady rollout. However, China’s state-driven model and different approach to privacy make it an outlier. For most other nations, the path is far less certain.
The global narrative has fundamentally shifted. The question is no longer “when will everyone launch a CBDC?” but rather “is a CBDC the right tool for the job?” For a growing number of countries, the answer, at least for now, is no. The focus has shifted toward a more grounded approach: fixing the plumbing of the current financial system before trying to build a brand new house on uncertain foundations. The era of CBDC hype is giving way to an era of financial pragmatism.
.png)